Shakespeare-centric theatre
companies often willfully restrict their performance canon to a base of 37
plays. (Or, 38 or 39, depending on what you think of some of the apocrypha). While
Shakespeare was very good at what he did, he was only one of the many authors writing
400 years ago, so, barring the discovery of some magical folio containing
countless previously unknown plays with “Yes, I totally wrote these. Love,
William Shakespeare” stamped across the front, we have 37 generally-agreed-upon
plays to work with.
I am of the
mind that half the fun is in interpretation and will happily sit and watch
every single production of Much Ado about
Nothing the ASC has mounted in the last ten years (many with the same or
similar cast members as the Much Ado
currently running in the Blackfriars Playhouse) and then ask for more. I’ve
seen so many different productions of Hamlet
that my eyes cross just trying to remember them all, but – hey! You’re doing Hamlet? Where? I’ll totally be there.
Can’t wait!
Yet, no
matter how many self-admitted weirdos like me there are out there, 37 plays may
just not be enough for a year-round, internationally renowned company, fronting
both a resident and a touring Shakespeare troupe. And (I suppose I should
probably say this now) it turns out there were other playwrights in the early modern English era. It also turns
out that some of them were writing some great stuff. Choosing to draw from this
well, the ASC does not exclusively perform Shakespeare. Since the ASC's first
non-Shakespearean early modern production, Beaumont and Fletcher's The Knight of the Burning Pestle in
1999, the company has mounted thirty-two plays by Shakespeare's contemporaries.
The current Actors’ Renaissance Season features Beaumont and Fletcher’s Philaster, which is such a joy, and
opening tomorrow is Thomas Middleton’s A
Mad World, My Masters.
My point about the whole
Shakespeare-centric, only-37-plays-to-work-with thing is that it’s rare for
someone like myself to go into the theatre completely ignorant of the play.
Usually, I’ve at least got the plot down, which frees my brain to focus on
other elements of the production. It’s easier to take in the nuance of
performance choices when you’re not constantly worried that you may have missed
some vital structural information. For Mad
World, though, I decided to skip all the rehearsals, to eschew reading the
play, and generally to remain ignorant about all of it – and then to show up to
the dress rehearsal and to see what’s what.
Here’s
what’s fun about dress rehearsals, especially during the ARS: the audience is
sparse, usually just in the single digits and made up of stage managers,
dramaturgs, box office staff, and interns. It’s low-pressure but high-fun. The
actors have had about ten days of rehearsal, this is the fourth play of the
season, and let’s just say I was certainly not the only one who’d never heard
of it until now. Oh, and it’s filthy. And I mean filthy. (The filthiness is scholastically verified by renowned
scholar Peter Saccio, so you know it's not just our dirty minds making too much
of the text). As a result, the actors are barely off-book, they’ve got on some
of the more insane costumes I’ve seen in my time here (Dan Kennedy as Bounteous
Progress is… words fail me), and they have to perform what is among the
bawdiest, raunchiest,
more-venereal-disease-jokes-than-even-George-Carlin-finds-appropriate play of
the early modern era.
They rocked it. This company is a well-oiled
machine. A fine wine. A perfectly tuned piano. They make mistakes the way Paula
Deen makes food: deliciously cheesy. Dan Kennedy, with fake facial hair and
old-man walker, lost his mustache several times during the performance and went
through such calisthenics to retrieve it from the ground that I was convinced
they’d planned it; it wasn’t until he righted himself, after much effort, and
called “Prithee!” that we realized the mustache was supposed to stay on his
face. That’s saying something, because this happened about five times, and each
time I was shocked when he called for line. That is, I would have been, if I
had had enough breath left to be shocked; most of it was spent laughing so hard
I may have bruised my ribs.
I’m glad I waited, because while
it’s a joy to watch a play progress over the rehearsal period, it’s equally
lovely to have a show bombard you, all at once, with every wonderful and
ridiculous device in the plot and the actors’ decisions on how to interpret
them. I don’t want to ruin too much, but here’s what you can look forward to:
Greg Phelps dressed as a woman and singing Aretha Franklin, Jeremy West tied to
a chair in a cop uniform, Dan Kennedy in general, a lot of rhyming verse, some
very loud sex, and some inappropriate, on-stage bodily functions.
A Mad World, My Masters is a delightfully
gut-busting play, made more so by the company that performs it. The Pay What
You Will opening is tonight, February 24th, and the show plays until
April 7th, You’re not going to want to miss this one. I walked into
the theatre with no idea of what I was getting into and feeling a bit wary, and
I walked out once again thankful that the ASC exists and performs shows like
this.
No comments:
Post a Comment