Benjamin Curns in Henry VI, Part 3, 2011. Photo by Tommy Thompson. |
This show is
kind of a big deal. It completes the tetralogy the ASC started in 2009. They
staged all three parts of Henry VI,
with much of the same cast reprising their roles throughout and doing some
interesting doubling. Ben Curns, our believed hunchbacked Richard, played the
good-hearted Humphrey in the Henry VI
plays until that character dies a sad and innocent death. The next time we see
him, it's as Richard, son of the Duke of York. The change is dramatic,
startling, and beautiful; just one of the many things that makes the ASC and
the ARS unique. We also got to follow Allison Glenzer as Lady Grey and eventual
Queen of England, John Harrell as Edward IV, and Sarah Fallon as the vicious,
visceral Margaret. If you saw all four plays, you know that this tetralogy has
been something special, and the ending is bittersweet.
If you
didn’t see all those plays, however, you can still thoroughly enjoy this
season’s production of Richard III. It
is, in my mind, the definitive interpretation of Shakespeare’s play. The smooth
and streamlined script, cut by Curns himself, keeps the action going apace
without losing any of the moral ambiguity. The poetry is beautiful, without
falling into some Marlovian quagmire of repetitive iambic pentameter droning. The
actors’ understanding of the story translates immediately to the audience: you
catch every word, and parts of the play that might have seemed opaque in other
productions or on the page become vividly, transparently understandable.
Richard
III opened soon after I first arrived in Staunton for my ASC internship. After seeing
it for the first time, I excitedly called my parents to gush over “how great it
was you guys oh my god you guys so good.” (Enthusiasm can render me somewhat
ineloquent). They, partly convinced I was wasting my life as an unpaid intern
at some (in their minds) random Shakespeare festival in Nowheresville, Virginia,
decided to come down and see what was so special about this play for themselves.
They’ve seen and read Richard III and
are generally familiar with Shakespeare, but not so much with the Blackfriars
Playhouse or our original staging conditions. It was new for them, and they
were clearly basing their opinions on my life choices on their thoughts of this
one production. It was risky for me. What if they didn’t like it?
I’m just
kidding. That thought never crossed my mind. I was a giddy mess throughout
their whole visit because I was so excited to share this Richard III with the people I love. It’s one of those things: like
a joke you just learned that you really want to tell everybody, but it’s so
funny you can’t stop laughing long enough to get the words out. You can see (though
that awareness never distracts from the production itself) just how brilliant,
innovative, and hardworking every single member of the company must be. The
whole play screams, “This is a well-oiled machine!” Actors create standout
performances when the play calls for them to do so – Aidan O’Reilly, as
Clarence, delivers his dream speech so compellingly that it gives me tunnel
vision, and Rene Thornton ,
Jr. raises one hell of a holy descant as Buckingham – and return to the
background when necessary as easily as fitting the pieces together in a twelve-piece
puzzle. But, ultimately, it is Richard’s play. And that’s where Ben Curns comes
in.
I would
like to point out that it is absolutely mind-boggling that Curns is playing
both Richard and Benedick (in Much Ado
about Nothing) this season. Sometimes he’d do a matinee of Much Ado, then an evening performance of
Richard III, and be brilliant in
both. He's either exceptionally talented or dangerously schizophrenic, but whatever, it works. His Benedick is lovely: funny, witty, sympathetic, and deep. But his
Richard is something else.
Allison Glenzer as Queen Elizabeth and Benjamin Curns as Richard in Richard III. Photo by Tommy Thompson |
His Richard
has no private persona. He has two public faces: the one he puts on for the
other characters in the play and the one he puts on for us. He is a showman who
needs and craves and loves his audience. In the famous opening speech, Curns
triumphantly proclaims to other cast members onstage that “now is the winter of
our discontent / made glorious summer by this son of York ” as he sends them off one by one, with
applause and accolades. But when they are gone, he switches, and turns to us.
From that moment on, we are his only constant ally. He seeks our approval, revels
in our disgust, and soaks up any admiration we manage to muster. Curns speaks
to us conspiratorially, as if we are in on Richard’s plot, or some integral
part of it, though we remain constantly aware that what he is doing is
repugnant to us.
In the Richard III Actor-Scholar council, Curns talks about prepping for
Richard by studying serial killers and thinking about Richard’s relationship to
his parents: his father, constantly telling him that he is special and destined
to be great, and his mother, constantly cursing his birth and him. That mixture
of overwhelming superiority and crushing inferiority turn Richard into this
strangely relatable monster who unconsciously believes that becoming king will
fix all of his problems, both physical and emotional. And when he does finally
take the crown, the moment is epic: the band strikes up some bragging, brassy
trumpets, and Richard enters bedecked in the richest form of every single status
signifier there is – crown, scepter,
cape – and approaches the throne he touched so longingly at the end of 3 Henry VI. Richard climbs into it with
the help of Buckingham and then turns to us: “Thus high, by thy advice / And
thy assistance, is King Richard seated!” He draws out the last three words
triumphantly as he sits, there is a moment of silence and then, fidgeting,
Richard realizes (as we do) that the chair has changed nothing, that he is
still a lump of foul deformity, that his mother still hates him and his father
is still dead.
Nowhere is this pitiful complexity
more evident, of course, than in Richard’s final soliloquy. It’s strange on the
page and often jarringly out of character on the stage, but not this time.
Firstly, Curns’s Richard has known this is coming, because he’s already known
that he is doing and has done terrible things and that ultimately there will be
consequences. Sixthly, as throughout the play, Richard is talking to us and not
to himself. Third and lastly, he is asking for our forgiveness as well as his
own and, most nights, we don’t give it to him. To conclude: he has to pay.
I feel sorry for him. I can’t help
it. He says, “All several sins, all used in each degree / Throng to the bar,
crying all…” and he stops, his eyes go wide as if he can see not only the
ghosts of those he has murdered, but also the corporeal form of all the pain
he’s caused. Half out of remorse, but half out of fear of what will come when
he is finally slain and goes, like Clarence in his dream, to the reckoning, he
croaks out: “guilty.”
Oh, and my parents loved it.
--Lia Razak
No comments:
Post a Comment